Vasilopoulos v. Krovatin Klingman LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “despite misstating the nature of ownership of the . . . property [the declaration] correctly identifies the debtor as an owner”
• finding that a debtor’s declaration of homestead “touche[d] all the bases required by M. G. L. c. 188, § 5, not squarely for sure, but that is not necessary” and concluding “that even [that debtor’s] ephemeral brush of the bases will suffice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).