Varty v. Varty
Citations
- 2020 ND 165
Syllabus
The district court abuses its discretion when it misinterprets or misapplies the law. A finding of unconscionability under Rule 60(b)(6) of the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure requires balancing procedural and substantive findings, and must analyze whether the judgment as a whole was so one-sided and created hardship that relief was required
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kinsella v. KinsellaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-12-04· cited 56×
- Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 45×
- Crawford v. CrawfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-12-02· cited 42×
- Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-06-17· cited 39×
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 37×
- Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-01-27· cited 35×
- Knutson v. KnutsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-02-20· cited 32×
- Vann v. VannNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-09· cited 25×
- Soli v. SoliNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 17×
- Meier v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-06-24· cited 15×
- Walstad v. WalstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-10-01· cited 10×
- Rebel v. RebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-09-25· cited 9×
- In Interest of DJHNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-03-02· cited 6×
- Varty v. VartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-02-21· cited 6×
- Varty v. VartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-07-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.