· 5/3/2002
Varsity Gold, Inc. v. Porzio
Citations
- 45 P.3d 352
- 202 Ariz. 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking covenant prohibiting conduct “‘in the State of Pennsylvania or any contiguous state’”
- arguments raised for first time in reply brief deprive other party opportunity to respond and are deemed waived
- geographical provision in covenant not to compete, which encompassed the entire state and contiguous states, was unreasonable, where employee worked only in one portion of one city
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timmer, Weisberg, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.