Skip to main content
· 5/3/2002

Varsity Gold, Inc. v. Porzio

Citations

  • 45 P.3d 352
  • 202 Ariz. 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking covenant prohibiting conduct “‘in the State of Pennsylvania or any contiguous state’”
  • arguments raised for first time in reply brief deprive other party opportunity to respond and are deemed waived
  • geographical provision in covenant not to compete, which encompassed the entire state and contiguous states, was unreasonable, where employee worked only in one portion of one city

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timmer, Weisberg, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.