· 5/22/1985
Varnson v. Satran
Citations
- 368 N.W.2d 533
- 1985 N.D. LEXIS 323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that if prison officials “were basing disciplinary decisions or parole-release determinations solely on the results of polygraph examinations, we would have serious reservations about the propriety of such a procedure”
- stating that if prison officials “were basing disciplinary decisions or parole-release determinations solely on the results of polygraph examinations, we would have serious reservations about the propriety of such a procedure”
- “A case is moot when a determination is sought which, when rendered, cannot have any practical legal effect upon a then-existing controversy.”
- “[W]e are not persuaded that due process under the Fourteenth Amendment or our State Constitution forbids, under all circumstances, a prison disciplinary committee or parole board from considering the results of a polygraph examination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vande Walle, Erickstad, Levin, Meschke, Gierke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.