Skip to main content
· 5/22/1985

Varnson v. Satran

Citations

  • 368 N.W.2d 533
  • 1985 N.D. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that if prison officials “were basing disciplinary decisions or parole-release determinations solely on the results of polygraph examinations, we would have serious reservations about the propriety of such a procedure”
  • stating that if prison officials “were basing disciplinary decisions or parole-release determinations solely on the results of polygraph examinations, we would have serious reservations about the propriety of such a procedure”
  • “A case is moot when a determination is sought which, when rendered, cannot have any practical legal effect upon a then-existing controversy.”
  • “[W]e are not persuaded that due process under the Fourteenth Amendment or our State Constitution forbids, under all circumstances, a prison disciplinary committee or parole board from considering the results of a polygraph examination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vande Walle, Erickstad, Levin, Meschke, Gierke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.