Varney v. Monroe Nat. Bank
Citations
- 119 La. 943
- 44 So. 753
- 1907 La. LEXIS 567
Syllabus
<p>1. Bills and Notes — Genuine Draft with Forged Bill of Lading.</p> <p>A draft was discounted, with bill of lading attached. It was genuine, and was drawn on plaintiff with his authorization, and was paid by him. The bill of lading was a forgery.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Gent. Dig. vol. 7, Bills and Notes, § 1269.]</p> <p>2. Same — Error.</p> <p>Plaintiff sued the defendant to return the amount, on the ground that it was paid in error and that defendant was liable for the error.</p> <p>3. Same — Business Relation Between Drawer and Plaintiff.</p> <p>What mistake there was, was plaintiff’s, for trusting the dishonest drawer of the draft, who annexed to it a forged bill of lading.</p> <p>Provosty and Monroe, JJ., dissenting.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
Judges: Breaux, Land, Monroe, Sty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.