Skip to main content
· 3/2/2007

Varner v. Cardenas

Citations

  • 218 S.W.3d 68
  • 50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 525
  • 2007 Tex. LEXIS 189
  • 2007 WL 624074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fees incurred in successfully defending against counterclaim in order to collect full amount of note need not be segregated
  • holding that fees incurred in successfully defending against counterclaim in order to collect full amount of note need not be segregated
  • holding that fees incurred in successfully defending against counterclaim in order to collect full amount of note need not be segregated
  • holding that fees incurred in successfully defending against counterclaim in order to collect full amount 20 of note need not be segregated
  • holding that fees incurred in successfully defending against counterclaim in order to collect full amount of note need not be segregated
  • holding that, since the note in question did not waive notices regarding acceleration, interest ran on the unpaid installments only after acceleration occurred.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.