Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the timeliness of a plaintiff’s personal injury action was a question for a fact-finder to determine and, as a result, summary judgment was improper
• “[T]he general rule in Pennsylvania regarding car accident cases is that the statute of limitations begins to run for an injured plaintiff on the day of the accident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vetter, J. and Jones, A. v. Miller, A.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-03-10· cited 14×
• Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-01-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gleason v. Borough of Moosic
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-04· cited 137×
• Swords v. Harleysville Insurance Companies
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-09-29· cited 85×
• Haines v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-30· cited 32×
• Walls v. Scheckler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-16· cited 16×

Other cases named Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Varner-Mort, D. v. Kapfhammer, B.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-01-21