· 3/21/2006
Varma v. Gutierrez
Citations
- 421 F. Supp. 2d 110
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11390
- 2006 WL 708203
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding dismissal, which causes refiling, would be “needlessly duplicative and costly”
- recognizing reduced expectations for allegations in pro se plaintiff’s complaint itself
- “In this case, to dismiss the action and direct the pro se plaintiff to refile her complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia would be needlessly duplicative and costly.”
- “In this case, to dismiss the action and direct the pro se plaintiff to refile her complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia would be needlessly duplicative and costly.”
- USPTO’s principal location is the Eastern District of Virginia
- USPTO’s principal location is the Eastern District of Virginia
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.