Skip to main content
· 3/21/2006

Varma v. Gutierrez

Citations

  • 421 F. Supp. 2d 110
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11390
  • 2006 WL 708203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding dismissal, which causes refiling, would be “needlessly duplicative and costly”
  • recognizing reduced expectations for allegations in pro se plaintiff’s complaint itself
  • “In this case, to dismiss the action and direct the pro se plaintiff to refile her complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia would be needlessly duplicative and costly.”
  • “In this case, to dismiss the action and direct the pro se plaintiff to refile her complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia would be needlessly duplicative and costly.”
  • USPTO’s principal location is the Eastern District of Virginia
  • USPTO’s principal location is the Eastern District of Virginia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.