Skip to main content
· 5/12/1992

Varker v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 417 S.E.2d 7
  • 14 Va. App. 445
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 2959
  • 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence of defendant’s hand print on wall inside dance studio but outside office broken into was insufficient to permit inference that he left print contemporaneously with break-in

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.