Vargas v. Transeau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiffs concede that access has not been proven and, therefore, rely solely on the contention that [the works] are strikingly similar.”
• “The court’s task is to apply logic and experience to determine if copying is the only realistic basis for the similarities at hand.”
• defendants succeed in “bolstering] their argument that striking similarity is lacking with evidence of independent creation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).