Vargas v. Jago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Ohio’s tolling statute as “an aged statute, with its most recent version listing an effective date of 1965”
• referring to Campbell as “soundly rejecting the contention that state tolling statutes affected the limitations period for § 1983 actions in the Sixth Circuit
• Ohio tolling statute not applicable to prisoner's section 1983 because statute inconsistent with federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).