Vargas v. Gallizzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Florida's ban on in-person solicitation by Certified Public Accountants violated the First Amendment
• ruling that courts cannot \supplant the precise interests put forward by the State with other suppositions\ in evaluating restrictions on commercial speech under the Central Hudson test
• holding that a Florida ordinance prohibiting Certified Public Accountants-from in-person solicitation was an unconstitutional restraint on free speech
• recognizing that the standard of review for commercial speech is whether the regulation is “tailored in a reasonable manner to serve a substantial state interest”
• holding that restrictions on commercial speech “need only be tailored in a reasonable manner to serve a substantial state interest”
• holding that Florida’s ban on in-person solicitation by Certified Public Accountants violated the First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).