Varela v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Defendants who seek removal must establish sufficient facts demonstrating that the plaintiff stands to recover in excess of $75,000
• finding that “Defendant provides the court with no underlying 10 facts to establish what the amount of” damages might be for “assistance with activities of daily living” and “loss of enjoyment of life”
• noting that “[iJnitial settlement offers are generally inflated, not deflated”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).