Varela v. Rohlf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that proof is only by a preponderance of the evidence because venue is not an element of a crime
• affirming venue in the district 45 where, among other things, the counterparties’ brokers were located and “purchases of [the] shares were executed, cleared, and recorded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).