Skip to main content
· 6/26/2001

Varela v. Flintlock Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 148 F. Supp. 2d 297
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8419
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 46
  • 2001 WL 709521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting Murphy Bros, to be consistent with the last-served defendant rule and applying this rule to avoid depriving the defendant of his procedural rights
  • “[R]emoval statutes are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts should be resolved in favor of remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.