Vanwyk Textile Systems, B v. v. Zimmer MacHinery America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff's claim that defendants destroyed his eyeglasses in violation of his due process rights
• dismissing the plaintiff's claim that defendants destroyed his eyeglasses in violation of his due process rights
• “Willfulness in performing the act . . . does not necessarily mean willfulness in violating the law. Willfulness in violating the law may qualify the case as exceptional” (citation omitted)
• the plaintiff was “not undercompensated by the award of the amount it urged upon the jury as the full amount of its lost profit”
• “Willfulness in performing the act . . . does not necessarily mean willfulness in violating the law. Willfulness in violating the law may qualify the case as exceptional” (citation omitted)
• no new trial unless prejudicial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).