Vantuyl v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 26 “impose[s] an affirmative duty on the objecting party to particularize with facts, not conclusory statements, the basis for these objections.”
• explaining the court has considerable discretion to tailor discovery to the circumstances of the case at hand, to adjust the timing of discovery, and apportion costs and burdens in a way that is fair and reasonable
• in employment discrimination case, ordering production of documents of similar incidents occurring within five year period preceding plaintiff's termination
• “The court is given great flexibility to . . . adjust the timing of discovery and apportion costs and burdens in a way that is fair and reasonable.”
• “[C]onclusory assertions of burden or cost are insufficient . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).