Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the internal affairs doctrine is constitutionally mandated to ensure that “only one state [has] the authority to regulate a corporation’s internal affairs” to avoid conflicting demands
• holding that a Delaware corporation’s certificate of designations must be adjudicated “exclusively in accordance with the law of its state of incorporation, . . . the law of Delaware”
• reiterating that the internal affairs doctrine concerns relationships among or between the entity and its officers, directors, and stockholders, and that state of incorporation’s law governs the “entire gamut of internal corporate affairs” (citation omitted)
• “The internal affairs doctrine applies to those matters that pertain to the relationships among or between the corporation and its officers, directors, and shareholders.”
• “The internal affairs doctrine applies to those matters that pertain to the relationships among or between the corporation and its officers, directors, and shareholders.”
• “The internal affairs doctrine applies to those matters that pertain to the relationships among or between the corporation and its officers, directors, and shareholders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).