Skip to main content
· 11/20/2003

Van't Rood v. County of Santa Clara

Citations

  • 6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 746
  • 113 Cal. App. 4th 549
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 12603
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10052
  • 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘the Subdivision Map Act constitutes the major land use permit control vehicle for urban planning and environmental protection,’” citation omitted
  • Except in rare cases where events subsequent to the lower court ruling under review have rendered the case totally moot, the appellate court does not, and may not, consider subsequent events.
  • “The principal must in 4 some manner indicate that the agent is to act for him, and the agent must act or agree to act on his 5 behalf and subject to his control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wunderlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.