Skip to main content
· 1/15/1985

VanOrman v. Shook

Citations

  • 602 F. Supp. 204
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where a medical expert testified that certain physiological and psychological changes that accompany the aging process decrease the person’s ability to drive safely and even the most refined examinations cannot detect all of these changes
  • both cases in which the bona fide occupational qualification defense was successfully asserted
  • where safety of fellow employees and third parties is threatened “the employer must be afforded substantial discretion in selecting specific standards which, if they err at all, should err on the side of preservation of life and limb”
  • reviewing history or distinction between legislative and adjudicative facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Enslen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.