Skip to main content
· 10/11/1995

Vann v. Travelers Companies

Citations

  • 39 Cal. App. 4th 1610
  • 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 617
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 15082
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8718
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding 26 factual disputes concerning contamination of property precluded coverage determination 27 in insurer’s favor
  • “In determining whether a duty to defend exists, 28 courts look to all the facts available to the insurer at the time the insured tenders its 1 claim for a defense.”
  • \Allegations of potential groundwater contamination may reasonably be read to include concerns for off-site contamination and such allegations are thus not necessarily limited to property occupied or controlled by [the insured property owner].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.