Skip to main content
· 3/11/1922

Vann v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Citations

  • 110 Kan. 799
  • 205 P. 607
  • 1922 Kan. LEXIS 153

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Limitation of Actions — Summons Issued — -Not Served on Defendant — Action Barred by Statute of Limitations. The filing of a petition and the issuance of a summons which was not served upon the defendant, cannot be regarded as the commencement of an action within the meaning of the statute of limitations, and where a judgment was given for plaintiff in such a proceeding on the service made which was reversed on appeal and a dismissal ordered on the ground that the service made was void, a new action brought by plaintiff within one year after the reversal is not within the saving provision of section 22 of the civil code.</p> <p>2. Same. The filing of a petition and the issuance of a summons which was served upon another than the defendant or upon one not authorized to receive service, does not interrupt the running of the statute of limitations.</p>

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.