· 1/3/2000
Vanlerberghe v. Apfel
Citations
- 82 F. Supp. 2d 1212
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1649
- 2000 WL 188316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claimant who receives retirement benefits from two countries is “not in need of the savings provisions of a totalization agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murguia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.