Skip to main content
· 1/3/2000

Vanlerberghe v. Apfel

Citations

  • 82 F. Supp. 2d 1212
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1649
  • 2000 WL 188316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claimant who receives retirement benefits from two countries is “not in need of the savings provisions of a totalization agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murguia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.