Skip to main content
· 4/11/1996

Vankempen v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

Citations

  • 923 F. Supp. 146
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9068
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1133
  • 1996 WL 204205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that receipt of a right-to-sue letter is a condition precedent, as opposed to a jurisdictional prerequisite, and therefore the requirement “may be cured after the action has begun”
  • concluding that receipt of a right-to-sue letter is a condition precedent, as opposed to a jurisdictional prerequisite, and therefore the requirement \may be cured after the action has begun\
  • “[R]eceipt of a notice of right to sue is a condition precedent to filing an MHRA civil action . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.