Nebraska Supreme Court· 7/31/1998
Vanice v. Oehm
Citations
- 582 N.W.2d 615
- 255 Neb. 166
- 1998 Neb. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a claim of laches is a defense which asserts “circumstances have changed such that the assertion of rights by the plaintiff would prejudice the adverse party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caporale, Connolly, Gerrard, McCormack, Stephan, White, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-27· cited 116×
- Kracl v. LosekeNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 93×
- VRT, INC. v. Dutton-Lainson Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 89×
- Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-27· cited 69×
- Welch v. WelchNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-07-22· cited 45×
- Bachman v. Easy Parking of America, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 45×
- Hanthorn v. HanthornNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-09-28· cited 30×
- Mandolfo v. ChudyNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-06· cited 24×
- Vanice v. OehmNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-01-27· cited 23×
- Production Credit Ass'n v. Eldin Haussermann Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-03-10· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Garvey v. County Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-01-02· cited 18×
- Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-01-02· cited 17×
- Brams Ltd. v. ELF Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-02-06· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.