Vanguard Insurance v. Racine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the terms \residents\ and \regularly resides\ in a homeowners policy are susceptible to different meanings and are therefore ambiguous
• concluding that the terms “residents” and “regularly resides” in a homeowners policy are susceptible to different meanings and are therefore ambiguous
• suggesting that “resident” may be interpreted “to include relatives who periodically stay in a home indefinitely, but maintain a legal domicile at some other location during the same period”
• stating, when a child spent time in both of his parents' households (but primarily his mother's) pursuant to a divorce decree, that the home the child was at \on the day of the accident\ was relevant to determining the child's residence under an insurance policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).