Vangsness v. Vangsness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court will uphold a district court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous
• holding that this court will uphold a district court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous
• stating that the possibility that the record could support an alternative finding does not mean that the district court erred
• noting that the fact that the record might support other findings does not by itself render a finding clearly erroneous
• stating that a party challenging a district court’s factual finding on appeal has the burden to show that the finding is clearly erroneous
• stating that the mere fact that the record “might support findings other than those made by the trial court does not show that the court’s findings are defective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).