Vango Media, Inc. v. The City of New York the New York City Department of Health and the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Act’s purpose is “to avoid diverse, non-uniform, and confusing labeling and advertising regulations with respect to any relationship between smoking and health.”
• holding pre-empted a regulation that required one public health message for every four cigarette advertisements
• holding pre-empted a regulation that required one public health message for every four cigarette advertisements
• finding that while the challenged statute had “an associated economic impact on society,” its “primary interest” was the preempted field of “public health”
• finding city ordinance requiring display of public health messages about health risks of smoking was “based on smoking and health” because both its purpose and effect centered on such risks
• finding city ordinance pertaining to tobacco product advertisements \plainly is a 'requirement'\ within the meaning of S 1334(b) because absent compliance with the ordinance, plaintiff would have to forgo advertising display

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).