· 8/2/1994
Federal Case
Citations
- 31 F.3d 882
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 10810
- 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1987
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5945
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a California decision that merely applied general rules of insurance contract interpretation did not regulate insurance and was not saved from preemption
- finding that a California decision that merely applied general rules of insurance contract interpretation did not regulate insurance and was not saved from preemption
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.