Vanerian v. Charles L Pugh Co, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Any argument that [the] defendant was not clearly aware that the scope of its contractual undertakings encompassed [the] plaintiff is absurd, given the nature of the contract; it was the ‘Marie Vanerian Residence’ job.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).