Vanderlinde v. 600 West 183rd Street Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the malice must be the \one and only cause\ for the publication to overcome the common interest privilege
• finding that, by reporting a matter to the police and “responding to inquiries from law enforcement” the company defendant did not initiate the criminal proceeding against the plaintiff
• reporting matter to police and responding to inquiries did not suffice to state malicious prosecution claim, absent allegation “that defendant played an active role in the prosecution”
• “One who does no more than disclose to a prosecutor all material information within his knowledge is not deemed to be the initiator of the proceeding.”
• “One who does no more than disclose to a prosecutor all material information within his knowledge is not deemed to be the initiator of the proceeding.”
• “One who does no more than disclose to a prosecutor all material information within his knowledge is not deemed to be the initiator of the proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).