Skip to main content
· 5/16/2016

Vanderhoof v. Ohio

Citations

  • 136 S. Ct. 2016
  • 195 L. Ed. 2d 224
  • 84 U.S.L.W. 3632
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[i]f an appellant ... chooses to designate specific determinations in his notice of appeal—rather than simply appealing from the entire judgment—only the specified issues may be raised on appeal”
  • applying McLaurin where notice of appeal designated order denying motion for reconsideration
  • elements of fraud and intentional misrepresentation claims did not require analysis of labor contract
  • “Because the defendants filed a timely motion to reconsider, the order to remand was not final, and the claims had not yet been remanded[,] [t]he district court had the authority to reconsider its own order[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.