Vander v. Daigle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \terms of imprisonment and mandatory parole terms are distinct elements of the sentencing regime\
• holding that plea agreement calling for an illegal sentence invalidated the guilty plea and could not be specifically enforced
• mittimus that does not specify the proper period of parole must be corrected by the sentencing court
• mandatory parole is a direct consequence of a guilty plea, but failure to advise of mandatory parole does not always invalidate the plea
• \[M]andatory parole is imposed in addition to the imprisonment component of a sentence.\
• reference to \D.0.C0.\ in sentence agreement clearly constitutes a reference to the term of confinement, not including the mandatory parole period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).