Vandenheuvel v. Wagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he words of a court rule, like those of a statute, must be taken and construed in the sense in which they were understood and intended at the time the rule was promulgated.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-12-07· cited 9×
• Rush v. Jostock
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-03-07· cited 7×
• Ernster v. Scheele
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-04-17
• Dave Knutson Siding LLC v. Dustin Fetter, Lisa Thostenson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2025-04-07

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-02-13· cited 33×
• Borchert v. Maloney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-16· cited 31×
• Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-06-07· cited 24×
• Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-10-31· cited 19×
• Everson v. Kapperman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-20· cited 8×
• Vandenheuvel v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-01-16· cited 2×

Other cases named Vandenheuvel v. Wagner

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Vandenheuvel v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-01-16· cited 2×