· 9/21/1983
Vandegrift v. American Brands Corp.
Citations
- 572 F. Supp. 496
- 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to the \hybridization\ between tort and contract that Monqe and its progeny have produced
- “If . . . the facts constituting the breach of the contract also constitute a breach of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff independent of the contract, a separate claim for tort will lie.”
- interpreting holding of Monge, supra
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.