Skip to main content
· 9/21/1983

Vandegrift v. American Brands Corp.

Citations

  • 572 F. Supp. 496
  • 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2317
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • referring to the \hybridization\ between tort and contract that Monqe and its progeny have produced
  • “If . . . the facts constituting the breach of the contract also constitute a breach of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff independent of the contract, a separate claim for tort will lie.”
  • interpreting holding of Monge, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.