Vandalia-Butler City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.
Citations
- 237 N.E.3d 369
- 2024 Ohio 742
Syllabus
The trial court did not err as a matter of law in finding that there is evidence of an educational impact supporting this transfer. The hearing officer's and the State Board's consideration of the location of the Property was entirely appropriate as part of the balancing of factors required when considering a transfer of school districts. Neither did the trial court abuse its discretion in finding that the Board's decision was supported by a preponderance of reliable, probative, and substantial evidence. The evidence showing the intent of the Petitioners to reside on the Property with their children and the location of the Property in relation to the Deer Cliff Run subdivision is reliable, probative and substantial evidence fully supporting the hearing officer's conclusion that the Property should be in the same school district as that of the Deer Cliff Run subdivision. This court may not reweigh the evidence, rebalance the factors, and substitute its judgment for that of the State Board where there is reliable, probative and substantial evidence supporting the decision of the hearing officer and ultimately the State Board. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no direct effect because “[t]he various contracts did not provide for payment in the United States, and the use of American personnel and equipment by IHL in Iraq seems to us to be so incidental to the interests of the United States as to be irrelevant”
- foreign defendant’s direction that money be deposited into its New York bank account does not satisfy “direct effect” test
- in shareholder derivative action, any injury to the corporation would have occurred in Missouri, the place of incorporation and the principal place of business
- “[A] radical shift in direction posed by these [proposed] 9 ||claims, their tenuous nature, and the inordinate delay will weigh against granting leave to 10 |}amend.”
- a financial injury to a foreign corporation does not constitute a direct effect in the United States when losses in the underlying transaction occurred elsewhere and method of transaction incidental to United States interests
- a cause of action in tort arises where injury to plaintiff first occurs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty Blunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.