Skip to main content
· 12/30/1891

Vance v. Wilhelm

Citations

  • 52 F. 602
  • 1891 U.S. App. LEXIS 1679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court “committed no error” because the issue “was never presented to it and it made no ruling upon it; and there is therefore no ruling before us to review, and no error to correct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.