Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.
Citations
- 170 U.S. 468
- 18 S. Ct. 645
- 42 L. Ed. 1111
- 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1558
Syllabus
<p>In determining from the face of a pleading whether the amount really in dispute is sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon a court of the United States, it is settled that if from the nature of the case as stated in the pleadings there could not legally be a judgment for an amount necessary to the jurisdiction, jurisdiction cannot attach even though the damages be laid in the declaration at a larger snip.</p> <p>The courts of South Carolina having held that in an action of trover conse- . quential damages are not recoverable, and the damage claimed by the plaintiff below, in this case, omitting the consequential damages, being le$s than the sum necessary to give the Circuit Court jurisdiction of it, it follows that, on the face of the complaint, that court was without jurisdiction over the action. ></p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mental distress damages not recoverable under state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, After Making the Foregoing Statement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.