Vance v. Pekin Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under a homeowner’s policy stating that the policy did not insure for any loss arising out of any acts committed by “an insured,” all insureds were barred from recovery if any insured committed the act
• upholding policy's intentional loss provision under contract-based theory, without reference to Iowa's standard fire insurance policy
• finding exclusion clear and unequivocal in barring coverage for all insureds
• adopting contract analysis to determine meaning of term “an insured”
• losses caused by \an insured\ excluded from coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).