Skip to main content
· 10/8/1992

Vance v. Casebolt

Citations

  • 841 P.2d 394
  • 16 Brief Times Rptr. 1592
  • 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 292
  • 1992 Colo. App. LEXIS 383
  • 1992 WL 275234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting distinction between the term of a license and the term of the license agreement itself
  • “[The CCTA] requires that, for a security interest in motor vehicles to be perfected, the secured party must note its security interest on the certificate of title”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Ney, Briggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.