Van Z. Krikorian v. Department of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a telegram reporting discussion between agency official and high-ranking foreign diplomat regarding terrorism properly was withheld because its release “would jeopardize ‘reciprocal confidentiality’ ” between governments
• holding that draft letters “reflect[ed] advisory opinions that are important to the deliberative process”
• holding that draft letters \reflect[ed] advisory opinions that are important to the deliberative process\
• holding that documents provided to the United States from a foreign government fell within FOIA Exemption 1 because the release of the documents would “jeopardize ‘reciprocal confidentiality’ and damage national security”
• recognizing the State Department's judgment that release would \jeopardize 'reciprocal confidentiality' and damage national security\
• recognizing the State Department’s judgment that release would “jeopardize ‘reciprocal confidentiality’ and damage national security”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).