Skip to main content
· 7/1/1862

Van Winkle v. Steamboat Henry Morrison

Citations

  • 23 How. Pr. 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that despite what the “motion court[]” described as the “tipster’s anemic resume as an informant,” significant evidence corroborated his claims about an impending drug sale, including text messages “indicating that the heroin delivery was ‘good to go’ as described”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingersoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.