Van Winkle v. Rogers

Oral argument

• Argued

  35 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal question jurisdiction of the federal courts under section 1331 is \subject ... to preclusion-of-review statutes created or retained by Congress\
• holding that federal question jurisdiction of the federal courts under section 1331 is “subject ... to preclusion-of-review statutes created or retained by Congress”
• holding that, except where statutes preclude review, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 \confer[s] jurisdiction on federal courts to review agency action\
• holding that “the APA does not afford an implied grant of subject-matter jurisdiction permitting federal judicial review of agency action”
• holding that the APA provides no independent grant of subject matter jurisdiction to review agency actions
• holding that Sec. 1331 confers jurisdiction on federal courts to review agency action \subject only to preclusion-of-review statutes created or retained by Congress\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).