Skip to main content
· 4/15/1850

Van Wart, Son & Co. v. Hopkins

Citations

  • 5 La. 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Proof that the case was dismissed [based on a certificate of disposition indicating sealing under § 160.50], without establishing the basis on which it was dismissed, is insufficient to establish that the case was terminated in favor of the accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Slidell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.