· 4/15/1850
Van Wart, Son & Co. v. Hopkins
Citations
- 5 La. 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Proof that the case was dismissed [based on a certificate of disposition indicating sealing under § 160.50], without establishing the basis on which it was dismissed, is insufficient to establish that the case was terminated in favor of the accused”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Slidell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.