Van Vlerah Mechanical, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Board is entitled to rely on inferences drawn from circumstantial evi- dence
• “In evaluating [§ 158(a)(3) allegations], the Board must determine the employer's motivation in taking a particular action.”
• “In evaluating [§ 158(a)(3) allegations], the Board must determine the employer's motivation in taking a particular action.”
• “We shall not ‘displace the Board’s choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though [we] would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before [us] de novo.” ’ (internal citation omitted) (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).