Skip to main content
· 5/9/1979

Van Valkenberg v. State

Citations

  • 594 P.2d 707
  • 95 Nev. 317
  • 1979 Nev. LEXIS 611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court cannot determine if a party's substantial rights were prejudiced by the trial court's exclusion of evidence under NRS 47.040(1) if trial counsel failed to offer proof of that evidence
  • supreme court will not review exclusion of evidence where trial counsel makes no offer of proof
  • court declines to review jury instruction where record indicates that counsel not only failed to object to instruction but also agreed to it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.