· 5/9/1979
Van Valkenberg v. State
Citations
- 594 P.2d 707
- 95 Nev. 317
- 1979 Nev. LEXIS 611
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that this court cannot determine if a party's substantial rights were prejudiced by the trial court's exclusion of evidence under NRS 47.040(1) if trial counsel failed to offer proof of that evidence
- supreme court will not review exclusion of evidence where trial counsel makes no offer of proof
- court declines to review jury instruction where record indicates that counsel not only failed to object to instruction but also agreed to it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.