Van Tassel v. Marks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a tenant whose lease terminates before condemnation suffers no deprivation of possession or beneficial use and suffers no injury compensable under the Code
• “When their lease expired, the plaintiffs no longer had any property interest in the premises, nor was there any interference with or deprivation of their possession or the beneficial use or enjoyment of their leasehold interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).