· 4/2/1992
Van Schaik v. Van Schaik
Citations
- 603 A.2d 908
- 90 Md. App. 725
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 60
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a party was held to have consented to appointment of counsel for a minor even though proceeding was uncontested
- a party was held to have consented to appointment of counsel for a minor even though proceeding was uncontested
- denial of due process when court decided merits of a custody dispute with “no notice at all that it would be considered nor any discussion during the hearing itself of that issue”
- denial of due process found because party did not have an opportunity for effective argument on issue when party had no notice that issue would be considered and there was no discussion of the issue at the hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.