Skip to main content
· 4/2/1992

Van Schaik v. Van Schaik

Citations

  • 603 A.2d 908
  • 90 Md. App. 725
  • 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a party was held to have consented to appointment of counsel for a minor even though proceeding was uncontested
  • a party was held to have consented to appointment of counsel for a minor even though proceeding was uncontested
  • denial of due process when court decided merits of a custody dispute with “no notice at all that it would be considered nor any discussion during the hearing itself of that issue”
  • denial of due process found because party did not have an opportunity for effective argument on issue when party had no notice that issue would be considered and there was no discussion of the issue at the hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.