Van Rensselaer's Heirs v. Penniman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the employee had consented to agreement where the agreement identified that “continued performance” constituted consent, so the employee “understood that the terms in the compensation plans governed his employment”
• “[S]ubstantive unconscionability is shown only by contract terms so one-sided as to ‘shock the conscience.’”
• mutual consent necessary for 13 conspicuously, courts look at a number of factors, including: whether the hyperlink’s font is adequately contrasted by the color of its background; how cluttered the webpage is (i.e., whether other things obscure the relevant link

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).