Van Oort Construction Co. v. Nuckoll's Concrete Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “was justified in suspending its performance under the contract until” the plaintiffs performed under the contract
• holding the non-compete agreement was the only purpose supporting installment payments to the former employee
• holding the defendant did not breach a contract by non-performance when the plaintiff had already materially breached the parties’ contract
• holding the defendant did not breach a contract by non-performance when the plaintiff had already materially breached the parties’ contract
• holding that the breach must be material
• buyer of business may suspend payments to shareholders as a result of their breach of a covenant not to compete

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).